Case study
UNIFIN DIGITAL LTD
Services Provided: Full corporate setup, AML/KYC compliance, and banking support.
Quick actions
Coordinate a commodity tokenization project from asset checks to launch
Gofaizen & Sherle provides commodity tokenization services that connect commodity assets, holder rights and provider responsibilities within one delivery plan. For businesses issuing tokenized commodities, coordination covers legal and regulatory support, custody arrangements and platform integration requirements. Each tokenized commodity needs a documented link between the token and the underlying assets.
| Area | Question to Resolve |
| Commodity tokenization model | What rights does each tokenized commodity represent? |
| Tokenized commodities | What goods back the tokens, where are they stored, and what proves ownership? |
| Custody | Who stores the goods, and who safeguards the tokens? |
| Compliance | Which requirements apply, and who must meet them? |
| Platform | How will the platform issue and transfer tokens? |
| Settlement | How will payments, token transfers and redemption work? |
| Market | Which investors and countries will the offering target? |
Custody Services
Define separate responsibilities for physical commodity storage and digital token custody.
Compliance Support
Identify applicable requirements and clarify who is responsible for compliance before implementation begins.
Platform Integration
Agree integration and security requirements with technology providers and identify dependencies that affect delivery.
This service is for companies and platforms preparing a tokenized commodity offering backed by physical assets for retail or institutional investors:
Start with the legal rights attached to the commodity token. Regulatory classification identifies which rules, including securities rules, apply to the tokenized commodity. Then assess issuance, trading and other planned activities separately to identify regulated services, required permissions and compliance duties:
| Activity | What to Check |
| Issuance | Which offering rules apply, and does the issuer need authorization? |
| Secondary trading platform | Which permissions are needed to operate the market or arrange trades? |
| Digital custody | Must a regulated provider safeguard client tokens, and what duties apply? |
| Commodity storage | Who owns the goods, and which local storage requirements apply? |
| Settlement | Do payment and token-transfer arrangements require separate permissions? |
The checks above identify the applicable requirements. For tokenized commodities, coordination covers the practical arrangements for issuance, custody, settlement and redemption, plus secondary trading where planned:
Commodity tokenization services combine project coordination with legal and compliance support, including custody documentation and platform integration requirements.
Gofaizen & Sherle prepares the issuer structure and holder-rights documentation, involving local counsel where required.
Gofaizen & Sherle defines onboarding and reporting requirements. Issuers and providers implement their assigned duties.
Gofaizen & Sherle reviews contractual responsibilities. External custodians handle storage and safekeeping operations.
Gofaizen & Sherle coordinates requirements and launch support. Technology providers build systems, while appointed specialists perform security reviews.
Gofaizen & Sherle connects legal structuring and compliance support for businesses considering institutional investors and global markets, including assessment of regulated provider roles.
The commodity tokenization process has six stages. The legal structure and applicable requirements guide development, onboarding and issuance:
Provide evidence of the underlying commodity, ownership, holder rights, inventory and custody arrangements in four input groups:
Timing depends on completing five milestones. Regulatory review, custody arrangements, provider onboarding and development can affect when delivery is possible:
Complete the asset evidence. Resolve missing ownership, storage and inventory records.
Confirm the regulatory route. Identify the applicable requirements and any authorization procedures that affect the schedule.
Complete provider onboarding. Agree custody arrangements, responsibilities and provider acceptance conditions.
Complete development and integration testing. Resolve technical issues and confirm that the connected workflows function as intended.
Close outstanding launch conditions. Confirm that the required documents, provider arrangements and operational checks are complete.
The applicable rules depend on what rights a tokenized commodity gives investors, where it is offered and whether the business handles issuance, trading or custody.
In the EU, the first legal question is whether the token qualifies as a financial instrument. If it does, MiCA Article 2 excludes it from MiCA, and the applicable securities framework must be assessed.
The issuer and each regulated service provider must then identify their own regulatory obligations, including applicable AML/KYC, reporting and other compliance duties.
Commodity tokens have no universal regulatory status. These four examples show how applicable rules differ by jurisdiction.
Last reviewed: September 23, 2026.
| Jurisdiction Example | Current Regulatory Position |
| European Union | MiCA covers in-scope crypto-assets. Tokens qualifying as financial instruments fall under the applicable securities framework. |
| United States | Tokenized securities remain subject to securities laws. Commodity derivatives fall within the CFTC framework. |
| Dubai, excluding DIFC | Tokens qualifying as Asset-Referenced Virtual Assets fall under VARA’s specific issuance rules. |
Assign AML/KYC, custody, security and reporting responsibilities across issuer and provider operations to address applicable duties toward investors:
Commodity backing does not guarantee a stable token price or repayment. Reserves may be insufficient, incorrectly valued or difficult to sell. Holders may face losses if the issuer or custodian fails, ownership rights are unclear, or redemption is delayed. Before buying, holders should understand what backs the token, how reserves are verified, and whether they can claim the commodity itself or only payment from the issuer.
Check how each relevant country taxes token sales, transfers of commodity ownership and redemption for cash or goods. Also check which financial and tax reports are required for the chosen legal structure. A token’s regulatory status does not, by itself, determine which taxes apply.
Commodity tokenization represents rights to a physical commodity through tokens. Compare a tokenized commodity with direct ownership and warehouse receipts:
| Model | Rights and Custody | Settlement and Access | Legal Assessment |
| Tokenized commodity | Tokens may represent ownership or a claim against the issuer. Physical storage and token custody are separate arrangements. | Eligible investors transfer tokens through supported wallets or platforms. Trading depends on available buyers and transfer restrictions. | Check token classification, required permissions and whether holders can enforce their rights to payment or goods. |
| Direct holding | Investors own physical assets and arrange storage themselves or through a provider. | Buyers and sellers arrange payment and delivery or transfer of ownership. Market access depends on finding a trading counterparty. | Check proof of ownership, storage contracts and transfer rules. |
| Warehouse receipt | A receipt records rights to goods held by a warehouse. The document defines the holder’s rights. | Where permitted, the receipt can be transferred while the goods remain in storage. Payment completes settlement. | Check whether local law recognises the receipt, allows its transfer and protects the holder’s claim to the goods. |
Protection depends on enforceable ownership or contractual rights, segregation and applicable insolvency law. A blockchain balance alone cannot establish title to goods.
Potentially, but assess its capability, contractual responsibilities and permissions for each function separately.
Where the model and law allow it. For EU asset-referenced tokens, MiCA Article 39 provides for redemption through payment or delivery of referenced assets.
No. Admission requires a separate platform decision and assessment of distribution restrictions. Liquidity is not assured.
Gofaizen & Sherle can assess eligibility. Regulatory classification establishes which offering rules apply, then investor categories and target countries determine distribution restrictions.
Each responsible provider must assess permitted reliance and whether records meet its AML/KYC obligations. Earlier onboarding is not automatic acceptance.
Yes. Gofaizen & Sherle can define legal and compliance requirements for the technology provider to assess integration needs and remaining gaps.
Client Testimonials
Great service and support, and very efficient communication with Maksim and the team. Our company has been successfully created with all the necessary licenses. Highly recommended.
Thomas Zelias
CEO - UAB TalentChain
Case study
Services Provided: Full corporate setup, AML/KYC compliance, and banking support.
Connect with our experts
Our experts will tell you how to do it as quickly and easily as possible.
By clicking the button, I confirm that I have read the privacy policy and consent to the collection and processing of my personal data in accordance with the GDPR rules.
Thank you
Thank you for reaching us. Our team is working on your request, and we will contact you soon.
Message not sent